Saturday, September 27, 2008

Who Had A Better Handle on The Facts?

Jed from the Huffington Post and The Jed Report put together a quick summary of what factcheck.org tracked for accuracy at the debate:

I've put together a summary of the misstatements of fact in last night's debate as tracked by FactCheck.org.

The bottom-line is that while Obama did make a few mistakes, none were outright fabrications, and even when wrong, he was fairly close to being accurate.

McCain, on the other hand, delivered several whoppers that weren't even close to the truth.

First, Obama's misstatements:

Denied voting for a budget plan that called for a tax increase on people making $42K. He did vote for a budget resolution with such a recommendation, but even if it had passed, it would have not have had the force of law. Moreover, he does not support such a tax increase in his current plan.

Claimed Iraq has a $79 billion surplus, but that figure is outdated and the actually number is now closer to $60 billion.

Claimed 95% of "the American people" would see a tax cut under his plan when he should have said "95% of American families with children."

Claimed McCain's health care plan would levy taxes against employers on health care premiums when McCain would actually be taxing individuals.


Second, McCain misstatements:

Denied Kissinger called for meetings with Iran without conditions, when Kissinger had made such a call.

Claimed Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen had criticized Obama's troop withdrawal plan when Mullen had not.

Claimed earmarks had tripled in the last five years when they have actually decreased.

Claimed U.S. pays $700 billion per year to buy oil from hostile nations when the actual figure is at most $359 billion.


Claimed Obama would hand the health care system to the federal government, which is false.


Claimed Dwight Eisenhower had penned a letter offering his resignation if Normandy had failed, but that didn't happen.


Basically, when Obama erred, he was saying 2 + 2 = 4.01. When McCain erred, he was saying 2 + 2 = 4,000,001.

John and Sarah, How Low Can You Go!

I can just here the conversation at McPalin HQ:"Yeah that's it we can place the entire hope of our campaign on marrying off Sarah's Pregger teenager to her high school drop out, hockey playing redneck boyfriend,"

McCain camp prays for Palin wedding
The marriage of the vice-presidential candidate’s pregnant teenage daughter could lift a flagging campaign

In an election campaign notable for its surprises, Sarah Palin, the Republican vice- presidential candidate, may be about to spring a new one — the wedding of her pregnant teenage daughter to her ice-hockey-playing fiancé before the November 4 election. Inside John McCain’s campaign the expectation is growing that there will be a popularity boosting pre-election wedding in Alaska between Bristol Palin, 17, and Levi Johnston, 18, her schoolmate and father of her baby. “It would be fantastic,” said a McCain insider. “You would have every TV camera there. The entire country would be watching. It would shut down the race for a week.” There is already some urgency to the wedding as Bristol, who is six months pregnant, may not want to walk down the aisle too close to her date of delivery. She turns 18 on October 18, a respectable age for a bride — and the same age as Barack Obama’s pregnant mother when she married his Kenyan father. The Democrat has already declared Bristol’s private life off-limits as far as his campaign is concerned.

The selection of Palin, 44, the moose-hunting governor of Alaska, as his running mate was one of McCain’s biggest gambles. It paid off handsomely at first, but she could benefit from a fresh injection of homespun authenticity, the hallmark of her style, provided by her daughter’s wedding after appearing out of depth away from her home state.



Charlie Crist must be pissed ....... "Damn it, that should be me being forced into a sham marriage for the good of the party"

More Rethuglican Tactics

Voting System Spots Really Campaign Ads, Critics Say

Elections Supervisor Buddy Johnson hasn't been spending much campaign money in
his re-election bid.

But that doesn't mean his name and face haven't been on the local airwaves, courtesy of the county's taxpayers.

Over the past few weeks, Johnson's voice and image have been heard and seen in a series of ads on TV and radio. Johnson's office has contracted with Schifino Lee, a local public relations firm, to create and buy advertising spots on radio and cable TV and print and distribute brochures.

In the ads, Johnson introduces himself as the elections supervisor, talks about the new optical scan voting system and assures voters the Nov. 4 elections will go smoothly.

"So you can be sure that your vote is counted and your choice made clear," he says in the ads.

Political observers say the timing and frequency of Johnson's ads raise concerns about whether they serve a dual purpose: educating voters and getting Johnson re-elected.

"It's basically free advertising," said Darryl Paulson, a political science professor at the University of South Florida in St. Petersburg, who has seen the ads. "It certainly doesn't seem appropriate, given that he is an incumbent supervisor running for re-election."

The cost of the ads, which are paid for from the budget of the election supervisor's office, is not clear. Elections office staff members couldn't provide financial figures this week, sayingit would likely take several days to compile the information.

Johnson did not return phone calls over the past several days.

State elections officials have been encouraging elections supervisors across the state to explain to voters the switch from electronic voting to paper ballots as the election nears.

In Pasco County, Supervisor of Elections Brian Corley has been sending out mailers and running voter education ads on radio stations but decided not to run them on TV.

"It's a very effective way to educate the voters," he said. "But it's also very expensive."

Corley said he is wary of attaching his name to voter education materials, concerned about the perception he is using taxpayer-funded ads to promote his campaign.

"There are some lines that just shouldn't be crossed," he said.

Records show Johnson has raised about $47,000 and spent $17,000 on his campaign. He raised no money from the end of July until the most recent filing deadline on Sept. 19.

Democrat Phyllis Busansky, who is challenging Johnson in the Nov. 4 election, has raised almost $128,000 - about $25,000 in the past month - and has spent about $66,000.

Johnson is at a critical time in his bid for another four-year term. Opponents criticized him before the Aug. 26 primary for a logo on sample ballots mailed to registered voters.

In the mailer's return address field, a new logo with the word "VOTE" in large, capital letters was juxtaposed next to Buddy Johnson's name and title.

He also was criticized for delays in posting the results on primary election night, though the company that manufactured the machines later took responsibility for the problem.

Busansky called Johnson's ads a "shameless use" of taxpayer dollars and says he's using his office to campaign for re-election.

"It's an egregious abuse of power," she said. "He hasn't raised a dime for his campaign in the past month, so whose money is he using? The taxpayers should be outraged."

Florida - Still Supressing Votes

Law puts thousands of Florida voter IDs in question

Florida's controversial 'no-match' law has already called into question thousands of new voter registrations.

About 3,200 new voters are in the cross-hairs of Florida's new and controversial ''no-match'' law, which could force them to cast provisional ballots on Election Day if officials can't confirm their identities.

The law, designed to prevent potential election fraud and remove joke names from voter rolls -- ''Ricco Suave'' and ''Joe Blow'' among them -- requires local elections officials to mail letters to anyone whose registration information doesn't match the state's driver's license or Social Security databases.

Only those who registered after Sept. 8 are affected. Since then, 71,000 new Florida voters have registered through Monday, according to Florida's elections division.

Miami-Dade County has now issued about 1,200 no-match letters, Election Supervisor Lester Sola said. Broward County sent out about 84 as of last week, said the election office's public services director, Mary Cooney.

The numbers are changing as new voters are added to the voter rolls through the Oct. 6 registration deadline.

Those who are flagged as a no-match, must provide either a driver's license or Social Security card to their county elections office at least 24 hours before Election Day. Otherwise, they'll have to cast a provisional ballot and bring their documentation to the elections office within two days to make their vote count.

Opponents worry that the law poses needless challenges to voters. The databases that elections officials use can have typographical errors that could call someone's registration into question, and the no-match notice could get lost in the mail, said Mary G. Wilson, national president for the League of Women voters.

''You know what happens: You're out of town, or you get busy and you put your mail aside and don't open it right away. So you may have no idea that there wasn't a match,'' she said.

Times They Are A Changing!

The History John Would Like You To Forget

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

And You Thought It Was Just A Movie

'Pre-crime' detector shows promiseNew Scientist revealed that the US Department of Homeland Security is developing a system designed to detect "hostile thoughts" in people walking through border posts, airports and public places. The DHS says recent tests prove it works.

Project Hostile Intent as it was called aimed to help security staff choose who to pull over for a gently probing interview - or more.

ommentators slated the idea that sensors could spot people up to no good from their pulse rate, breathing, skin temperature, or fleeting facial expressions. One likened it to the "pre-crime" units that predict criminal behaviour in the movie Minority Report.

However, last week, the DHS science unit gave an update on the project, now dubbed the less-hostile-sounding Future Attribute Screening Technologies (FAST) programme. And, if DHS claims are to be believed, the research appears to be getting somewhere.

Monday, September 22, 2008

Crash and Burn

Crashed the blog today and the restore is not working, so 455 posts in almost a year, I will be manually restoring over the next few weeks , I do have the copy for all but a few post, just kinda sucks though

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Too Stupid To Be In Charge

“Oil and coal? Of course, it’s a fungible commodity and they don’t flag, you know, the molecules, where it’s going and where it’s not. But in the sense of the Congress today, they know that there are very, very hungry domestic markets that need that oil first,So, I believe that what Congress is going to do, also, is not to allow the export bans to such a degree that it’s Americans that get stuck to holding the bag without the energy source that is produced here, pumped here. It’s got to flow into our domestic markets first.”


And she knows more then anyone else in the United States about energy? John have you been sneaking Cindy's Vicodin?

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Even More - Too Stupid To Be In Charge

“Oil and coal? Of course, it’s a fungible commodity and they don’t flag, you know, the molecules, where it’s going and where it’s not. But in the sense of the Congress today, they know that there are very, very hungry domestic markets that need that oil first,So, I believe that what Congress is going to do, also, is not to allow the export bans to such a degree that it’s Americans that get stuck to holding the bag without the energy source that is produced here, pumped here. It’s got to flow into our domestic markets first.”


And she knows more then anyone else in the United States about energy? John have you been sneaking Cindy's Vicodin?

More - Too Stupid To Be In Charge

Palin's transparency proposal already exists in D.C.

Sarah Palin likes to tell voters around the country about how she “put the government checkbook online” in Alaska. On Thursday, Palin suggested she would take that same proposal to Washington.

“We’re going to do a few new things also,” she said at a rally in Cedar Rapids. “For instance, as Alaska’s governor, I put the government’s checkbook online so that people can see where their money’s going. We’ll bring that kind of transparency, that responsibility, and accountability back. We’re going to bring that back to D.C.”

There’s just one problem with proposing to put the federal checkbook online – somebody’s already done it. His name is Barack Obama.

Watch: Palin says 'Obama hasn't lifted a finger'

In 2006 and 2007, Obama teamed up with Republican Sen. Tom Coburn to pass the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, also known as “Google for Government.” The act created a free, searchable web site – USASpending.gov — that discloses to the public all federal grants, contracts, loans and insurance payments.


In June of this year, Obama and Coburn introduced new Senate legislation to expand the information available online to include details on earmarks, competitive bidding, criminal activities, audit disputes and other government information.

Palin might also have noted that her running mate, John McCain, was an original co-sponsor of the 2006 transparency bill that became law.

Scary Stuff!

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Just Too Stupid To Be In Charge - I Knew This Was Coming

Hackers claim break-in to Palin's e-mail
Palin used Yahoo! account for business as Alaska governor
The Associated Press
updated 5:14 p.m. ET, Wed., Sept. 17, 2008
WASHINGTON - Hackers broke into the Yahoo! e-mail account that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin used for official business as Alaska's governor, revealing as evidence a few inconsequential personal messages she has received since John McCain selected her as his running mate.

"This is a shocking invasion of the governor's privacy and a violation of law. The matter has been turned over to the appropriate authorities and we hope that anyone in possession of these e-mails will destroy them," the McCain campaign said in a statement.

The Secret Service contacted The Associated Press on Wednesday and asked for copies of the leaked e-mails, which circulated widely on the Internet. The AP did not comply.

The disclosure Wednesday raises new questions about the propriety of the Palin administration's use of nongovernment e-mail accounts to conduct state business. The practice was revealed months ago — prior to Palin's selection as a vice presidential candidate — after political critics obtained internal e-mails documenting the practice by some aides.

One person whose e-mail to Palin apparently was among those disclosed, Amy B. McCorkell, declined to discuss her correspondence. "I do not know anything about it," McCorkell said. "I'm not giving you any comment." Wired.com said McCorkell later confirmed that she did send the e-mail to Palin.

Another of the e-mails apparently revealed Wednesday was an exchange in July with Alaska Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell discussing a talk show host who had been critical of Parnell. Parnell declined to discuss the matter.

Palin herself used "gov.sarah" in her e-mail address, and her husband used "fek9wnr" in his address. "Fe" is the representation for iron, and "k9" is an abbreviation for canine. Todd Palin was the winner of the grueling Iron Dog snowmobile race, and "fek9wnr" also is Todd Palin's vehicle license tag in Alaska.


It wasn't immediately clear how hackers broke into Palin's Yahoo! account, but it would have been possible to trick the service into revealing her password knowing personal details about Palin that include her birthdate and ZIP code. A hacker also might have sent a forged e-mail to her account tricking her into revealing her own password.

McCorkell was appointed by Palin to an advisory board on issues involving alcohol and drug abuse. One of the leaked e-mails suggested McCorkell wrote to Palin on Sunday to say she was praying for Palin. "Don't let the negative press get you down!" the message said.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Sarah Won't Blink - I Feel Safer Now

The Colbert Report: How Dare You Ask McPalin Questions?



John McCain and Sarah Palin are not only saying they won't give answers, they're saying you can't ask questions.

Perhaps John should spend a weekend at Bernies

John could learn a thing or two about his "Fundementally Sound Economy" from Bernie

Tweety Comes Through!