Saturday, December 8, 2007

Huckabee - 1992 - "AIDS Plague - Must Be Quarantined"

Boy this should be good, can’t wait to hear how he spins this one:

As a candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in 1992, Huckabee answered 229 questions submitted to him by The Associated Press. Besides a quarantine, Huckabee suggested that Hollywood celebrities fund AIDS research from their own pockets, rather than federal health agencies.

"If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague," Huckabee wrote.

"It is difficult to understand the public policy towards AIDS. It is the first time in the history of civilization in which the carriers of a genuine plague have not been isolated from the general population, and in which this deadly disease for which there is no cure is being treated as a civil rights issue instead of the true health crisis it represents."

…………………………………….

 

When asked about AIDS research in 1992, Huckabee complained that AIDS research received an unfair share of federal dollars when compared to cancer, diabetes and heart disease.

"In light of the extraordinary funds already being given for AIDS research, it does not seem that additional federal spending can be justified," Huckabee wrote. "An alternative would be to request that multimillionaire celebrities, such as Elizabeth Taylor (,) Madonna and others who are pushing for more AIDS funding be encouraged to give out of their own personal treasuries increased amounts for AIDS research."

 

Crazy King George - "Dude, I am the law!!"

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, after forcing declassification of a few of the Office of Legal Council secret legal opinions meant to justify some of Crazy King George’s actions, went to the well of the Senate to tell us what he found:

For years under the Bush Administration, the Office of Legal Counsel within the Department of Justice has issued highly classified secret legal opinions related to surveillance. This is an administration that hates answering to an American court, that wants to grade its own papers, and OLC is the inside place the administration goes to get legal support for its spying program.

As a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I was given access to those opinions, and spent hours poring over them. Sitting in that secure room, as a lawyer, as a former U.S. Attorney, legal counsel to Rhode Island's Governor, and State Attorney General, I was increasingly dismayed and amazed as I read on.

To give you an example of what I read, I have gotten three legal propositions from these OLC opinions declassified. Here they are, as accurately as my note taking could reproduce them from the classified documents. Listen for yourself. I will read all three, and then discuss each one.

1. An executive order cannot limit a President. There is no constitutional requirement for a President to issue a new executive order whenever he wishes to depart from the terms of a previous executive order. Rather than violate an executive order, the President has instead modified or waived it.

2. The President, exercising his constitutional authority under Article II, can determine whether an action is a lawful exercise of the President's authority under Article II.

3. The Department of Justice is bound by the President's legal determinations.(my bold)

…………………………………………………..

If you don’t feel a difference from what you were feeling a moment ago, well, congratulations – there is probably a job for you in the Bush administration. Consider the sad irony that this theory was crafted in that very building, by the George W. Bush Office of Legal Counsel.

In a nutshell, these three Bush administration legal propositions boil down to this:

1. “I don’t have to follow my own rules, and I don’t have to tell you when I’m breaking them.”

2. “I get to determine what my own powers are.”

3. “The Department of Justice doesn’t tell me what the law is, I tell the Department of Justice what the law is.” (my bold)

Hello, where is the MSM on this? This is huge people! These opinions taken together put the President above the law, in fact it makes him a law unto himself. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

Let’s look at a section of Article 1 of the Constitution:

Section 8: The Congress shall have power

To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;

To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;

To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;

To establish post offices and post roads;

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;

To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water; (my emphasis)

To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;

To provide and maintain a navy;

To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;—And

To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

George, right there in the Constitution, it says Congress makes the rules concerning captures on land and water, Not the President, so Gitmo was illegal from day one, there was no basis for the term “enemy combatant”.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Our Tax Dollars at Work

Teenage Birth Rate Rises for First Time Since ’91

The birth rate among teenagers 15 to 19 in the United States rose 3 percent in 2006, according to a report issued Wednesday, the first such increase since 1991. The finding surprised scholars and fueled a debate about whether the Bush administration’s abstinence-only sexual education efforts are working.

The federal government spends $176 million annually on such programs. But a landmark study recently failed to demonstrate that they have any effect on delaying sexual activity among teenagers, and some studies suggest that they may actually increase pregnancy rates.

“Spending tens of million of tax dollars each year on programs that hurt our children is bad medicine and bad public policy,” said Dr. David A. Grimes, vice president of Family Health International, a nonprofit reproductive health organization based in North Carolina.

Robert Rector, a senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation, said that blaming abstinence-only programs was “stupid.” Mr. Rector said that most young women who became pregnant were highly educated about contraceptives but wanted to have babies.

 

Gee, who would’ve thunk it??? Duh, maybe anyone with half a wit. The part I love is the idiot from the Heritage Foundation, it is all because the young women wanted to have babies.

Another Win For The Good Guys

After a week long trial in the political prosecution of Dr. Catherine Wilkerson the jury found she was NOT GUILTY on all counts.

Victory--Monday 12/03/2007

Defense co-counsel Hugh "Buck" Davis delivered an impassioned closing argument today in the trial of Dr. Catherine Wilkerson that put on full display both the political stakes of the case and the dishonesty of police and prosecution. Attorney Davis pointed out that only one witness, UM custodian Michael Lafleur, ever testified to any overt physical act by Dr. Wilkerson and that testimony was not credible nor was it corroborated by any other of the 19 witnesses. Davis made it clear that the University of Michigan and Washtenaw County Prosecutor Brian Mackie were trying to criminalize speech and protest. Huron Valley Ambulance paramedic supervisor Dean Lloyd was pinpointed as the man who instigated the attack by Ann Arbor Police Officer Kevin Warner on Dr. Wilkerson after she criticized Lloyd's dangerous use of a toxic substance on a man he said he thought was faking (medical records admitted into evidence on Friday indicated that he had suffered a traumatic brain injury). Lloyd, said Davis, told Warner to take away Dr. Wilkerson's free speech rights and "to his everlasting shame," Warner obeyed. In his final remarks, Davis compared Dr. Wilkerson's case with the case of the LS&A 109 who staged a sit-in at the University of Michigan in 1970 against the Vietnam war. Davis pointed out that the LS&A 109 were technically guilty but that jurors had acquitted those he represented because they had acted ethically in opposing the war. By contrast, he argued, jurors today had in their hands the fate of someone who was technically innocent but whom the prosecution was still trying to convict precisely because she had acted ethically. 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Margaret Connors had the final word in her rebuttal. She defended Dean Lloyd's use of ammonia, arguing that he thought his patient was faking. Connors never acknowledged or, apparently, never understood just how damaging this admission was to her own case. It was clear that she was personally stung by Mr. Davis' remarks; at one point, she even sputtered that she was a doctor, too, because she had a Juris Doctor degree. The mainstay of her presentation involved a large sheet of paper on an easel. The sheet had the statutory elements of the crimes Dr. Wilkerson was accused of, though tellingly "assault" was blacked out. As Connors rehearsed once more the sad, fabricated police and prosecution narrative of the case, she would place a check mark next to each element she had putatively proven. When she was done the sheet had dozens of red check marks on it. But the jury wasn't buying any of it, after four-and-a-half hours of deliberation they returned two verdicts of "not guilty."

 

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Hey Rednecks - You Lost The War You Morons

Southern Protestors Unhappy with Thompson and Romney's Flag Remarks      

ABC News' Christine Byun Reports: As GOP presidential hopeful Fred Thompson wrapped his South Carolina campaign visit, he had a small handful of protesters outside his event at a Lexington, South Carolina restaurant.

About four men held confederate flags and signs that said "Honk for Dixie" and "The South Does Not Want Fred Thompson."

The men said they were part of the South Carolina League of the South and speaking out against Thompson and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney for recent remarks about something dear to their hearts. At the November 28 CNN/YouTube debate, both candidates said they did not believe the Confederate flag should be flown in a public place. The two Republican hopefuls, who are among the leaders in Palmetto State polls, also said the flag wrongfully divides the country.

"When a Southerner goes bad, we call him a scallywag. Thompson's a scallywag - he deserves no respect," Jim Hanks, who identified himself as a registered Independent, said. A scallywag is a white southerner who supported the federal government during Reconstruction. Hanks also said he was interested in Thompson, but now supports Ron Paul.

The group also lashed out at Romney - who called the flag was "divisive" at the debate - for being a "carpetbagger."

"Most people think the flag is a racist symbol. I would say not in South Carolina, we don't. Not in the South, we don't. We don't vote for people that say negative things about the Confederate flag," Don Gordon, a protestor who wore a Confederate flag tie, said.

The group intends to protest every campaign stop in South Carolina for both candidates.

"Yesterday, we were at Mitt Romney's headquarters because Mitt Romney insulted our flag," Hanks said. "We'll try to be everywhere they are."

I just do not get it, “heritage” they say, is what the confederate flag means to them, heritage of what being LOSERS. Let me say this really slow in little words, you lost the war moron.

 

Living in a bubble - surronded by incompetent staff - Our Next President???

Well the only conclusion to be drawn from this little bit at Politico.com is that Huckabee has shown he has the same ability to surround himself  with incompetent staff and the inability to read a newspaper that George has:

Kuhn: I don’t know to what extent you have been briefed or been able to take a look at the NIE report that came out yesterday ...
 
Huckabee: I’m sorry?

Kuhn: The NIE report, the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran. Have you been briefed or been able to take a look at it —

Huckabee: No.

Kuhn: Have you heard of the finding?

Huckabee: No.

Kuhn then summarized the NIE finding that Iran had stopped work on a clandestine nuclear program four years ago and asked if it “adjusts your view on Iran in any sense."

Kuhn: What is your concern on Iran as of now?

Huckabee: I’ve a serious concern if they were to be  able to weaponize nuclear material, and I think we all should, mainly because the statements of Ahmadinejad are certainly not conducive to a peaceful purpose for his having it and the fear that he would in fact weaponize it and use it. (He pauses and thinks) I don’t know where the intelligence is coming from that says they have suspended the program or how credible that is versus the view that they actually are expanding it. … And I’ve heard, the last two weeks, supposed reports that they are accelerating it and it could be having a reactor in a much shorter period of time than originally been thought.

Kuhn: Does the United States face a higher burden of proof on Iran in light of Iraq, in the international community?

Huckabee: Probably so. First time I’ve been asked a question like that. But I think probably so because there is going to be a real anxiety for us to take any type of action without there being some very credible and almost irrefutable intelligence to validate our decision.

Kuhn: And then on the flip side of that. a conservative concern might be, does the United States, might they hedge, might they be timid from taking necessary aggressive action due to the failures of intelligence on Iraq, and our failures in Iraq itself?

Huckabee: I think that’s a possibility as well. And that would be unfortunate if we actually knew we needed to take action but were fearful of doing so because of getting burned in the Iraq situation. That would be a serious challenge for us.

 

1984 - Don't worry we'll tell you what to believe...no wait....uuuh you didn't see anything..err uhh..

We are either victims of the most incredibly inept administration in history, or they are just plain evil and there is some diabolical plot here that we all just fail to fully comprehend.

Let’s see we pound the war drums to drive up the price of oil for Bush's Saudi Masters and the price at the pump to ensure Dick’s hunting buddies huge profits and we keep beating the drum until the gas prices just about push the inflation bubble to bursting on household goods(been grocery shopping lately), meanwhile insisting that we will no longer release unclassified versions of NIEs , then just when its about to really damage the economy we say oops never mind, and watch gas prices fall 20 cents in 24 hours (they did in my neighborhood). Ok so how’s that for some conspiracy theory for you. Either that or Joe is right:

“Are you telling me a president who is briefed every single morning, who is fixated on Iran, is not told back in August that the tentative conclusion of 16 intelligence agencies in the United States government said they had abandoned their effort for a nuclear weapon in ’03?” Biden said in a conference call with reporters.

“That’s not believable,” Biden added. “I refuse to believe that. If that’s true, he has the most incompetent staff in … modern American history and he’s one of the most incompetent presidents in modern American history.”

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Our Police State - Taser Mania - oops, sorry about that!

Hearing Impaired Man Tased by Police
Donnell Williams had just gotten out of the bath tub, wearing only a towel around his waist, when he turned the corner to see guns pointing right at him.

"I ain't never been so scared," says Williams.

Police forced entry into Williams home while responding to a shooting, but it turned out to be a false call.  They had no idea at the time the call wasn't real and that Williams is hearing impaired.  Without his hearing aid he is basically deaf.

"I kept going to my ear yelling that I was scared.  I can't hear!  I can't hear!"

Officers were worried about their own safety because at the time it appeared Williams was refusing to obey their commands to show his hands.  That's when they shot him with a Taser.

Deputy Chief Robert Lee of the Wichita Police Department says, "This one occurred on the worst of calls, that being a shooting. The first few minutes getting control of the scene are very, very important."

Once the facts were all sorted out, officers repeatedly apologized to Williams.  Police wish it never happened, but with the information they had at the time, their choices were limited.

"Do I wish there would have been some way they were notified in advance this gentleman was hearing impaired?  I certainly do.  No one is happy with the way it worked out," says Lee.

Williams was not hurt in the incident.  Police say the shooting call came from a cell phone but they still don't know who made it or why.

The case is being reviewed by the department.

This is the best yet, now you can get Tased in your own home while fresh out of the tub. Well who knows just what he was hiding behind that towel, it may have been a deadly weapon.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Deja Vu All Over Again - More Bush Lies

Cheney Tried to Stifle Dissent in Iran NIE

WASHINGTON - A National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran has been held up for more than a year in an effort to force the intelligence community to remove dissenting judgments on the Iranian nuclear program, and thus make the document more supportive of U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney’s militarily aggressive policy toward Iran, according to accounts of the process provided by participants to two former Central Intelligence Agency officers.

But this pressure on intelligence analysts, obviously instigated by Cheney himself, has not produced a draft estimate without those dissenting views, these sources say. The White House has now apparently decided to release the unsatisfactory draft NIE, but without making its key findings public.

A former CIA intelligence officer who has asked not to be identified told IPS that an official involved in the NIE process says the Iran estimate was ready to be published a year ago but has been delayed because the director of national intelligence wanted a draft reflecting a consensus on key conclusions — particularly on Iran’s nuclear program.

What is wrong with these people, so long before Bush invoked the threat of WWIII and the Neo-cons started the drum beats of war again, they knew that this was all baseless propaganda. This administration has done what would to most rational people seem to be the impossible, they have made Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seem more credible then the President of the United States, supposed “leader of the free world”.

You absolutely have to ask yourself where is this all going to lead…..the conspiracy theory folks are looking more and more rational everyday, is the goal to create an International Crisis that would allow Bush to stay in office (ala Rudy’s attempt at remaining Mayor after 9/11)

 

Sunday, December 2, 2007

This a your retirement dollar....This is your retirement after privitization

While the entire Blogoshere functions on a rather incestuous reposting of one another’s Blog post and commentary on these post I am not a big fan of the “full repost” of another bloggers original post, but folks DailyKos does such a great job on this that here goes:

Congratulations, Citizen!

Back on 2001, right after Inauguration Day, $10,000 of your Social Security funds were placed in a special magic pony account where it would enjoy the explosive benefits of the our surging prosperity, and the Longest Terra-fightin' Expansion in HISTORY... History... history. All of this made possible by cutting taxes on the productive people at the top of the food chain and removing those regulations that prevented our financial institutions from using all their imagination in creating new ways to give... to give you money! We at the Treasury know there was some discussion about not going along with the president's plan, but I think you'll agree that what we've learned over the last seven years is that the president can do anything he wants and no one will do more than talk about stopping him. So we just did it! Say, why not send us a subpoena? That'd be a hoot!

Now, as we close in on the last year of this glorious wondertime, here's a quick report on how your outsourced, privately-managed fund has done.

2002 – Okay, your original $10,000 is now worth $9, 182. But hey, 9/11, ya know? We all have to make some sacrifices. Besides, inflation was so low that you still have $9079 as much buying power as you did the year before. Hustle on off now and shop.

2003 -- Your balance is now $7863. See 9/11. Add in the absolute need to go after Saddam, who we all know was behind it all and is planning to attack the United States with his perfectly maintained massive military, loads of chemical weapons, and nuclear bombs. (Oh yeah, that's $7578 in pre-9/11 dollars, and you're a traitor for even asking.)

2004 -- You're a winner! All those gloomy Gusi have been proven wrong. Your piddly $10,000 original is now $10,042. That's $9,495 in 2001 dollars, but don't thank us now. Just you wait till next year!

2005 -- Eh, call it a push. So you're down to $9,824. Look at how much you've gained since 2003! There's always a silver lining. After all, $9021 original dollars is a lot better than where you were.

2006 – Now you have $10,104, so you're back on top again. And besides, this economy is coiled like a spring! Here it comes... $8922 original dollars after inflation on their way to a million.

2007 – Boom! $11,795 is yours. Everyone who ever said the market wouldn't take care of this thing is proven wrong. Don't say those fund managers weren't worth the $90 million a year we've been paying them, just because they only match the Dow mix. Best of all, when you account for inflation, that's still a $201 gain in only six years. $34 a year. We're completely sure you don’t mind us putting $10K at risk for those kinds of gains.


Just be glad you didn't need to retire in 2002. Or 2003. Or 2004. Or 2005. Or 2006. And be glad you didn't invest at the peak of the market back in the late 90s. $10,000 put in back then would be down by a cool thou when you adjust for inflation. While you're at it, give thanks you chose the right fund. Because if our investors had matched the most widely used index – S&P – rather than the Dow, you wouldn't have that huge gain. See, with the Dow stocks get swapped in and out, and it only matches a little part of the market. The S&P covers a much bigger part of the market, and if you'd invested there, you'd have $10,554 now. Or $9127 in 2001 dollars.


http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/363/SP_dollars.JPG

Thank goodness you didn't invest in real estate funds that went pop, or in banks that invested too much in bad debts, or in one of the 75% of mutual funds that underperformed the Dow.

Be really grateful that our fund managers charged you absolutely nothing for this service, because if you'd had to pay the kind of overhead most mutual funds carry, it would have more than carried away your gains, and then some. Fortunately, we knew that there were hundreds of big Wall Street firms out there, willing to help out the American citizen for free. Wall Street is known for being generous like that.

Now that we've made you all this money, how are you going to spend it? We suggest a nice vacation to Europe. You might want to order a few extra traveler's checks. If you're hoping to drop in on Cool Britania, because it'll take about $1,378 to exchange for the same number of pounds that $1,000 would have bought in 2001. The dollar is worth a whole 67% of what it used to be across the channel in Freedomland.

We know that you were considering a vacation home up in Nova Scotia, maybe looking for something around the $150,000 range. And really, that was a great idea in 2001. But if you want to spend the equivalent up there now, you'll need to pony up $234,000 – and that's before you start figuring in the rising cost of homes. So maybe you'd be better off thinking about keeping that money in your own country, right?

With all that, I'm sure you agree that we made the right moves economically. Why, when you consider the explosive rise in home prices, and all the joy our reduced taxes have brought, there are almost half a million new millionaires in this country. And for that, we only have an increase of about 7 million people living in poverty.

Sure, median family income was down about $2,000 from 2001 to 2004, but that was the bad times. We don't have the numbers yet, but we're sure it's soared since then, because as we all know, when the people at the top making their money off the stock market are doing well, that rising tinkle-down stream of Reaganomic voodoo raises all the little boats on a warm yellow tide. Sure, the median family is carrying more of the tax burden than they were back then. Sure, health care costs have destroyed most of the value of your savings. Sure, the average family is working more hours, carrying more debt, and seeing less return.

But we think you'll agree, it was all worth it. After all... more millionaires! Now, about the rest of that Social Security account. Wait till you hear what we've done with that!

(Methodology and sources: prices for the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P Index were taken from Google historical stock prices on the day of trading closest to the anniversary of inauguration day. Inflation calculated using the US Department of Labor Consumer Price Index values 15 Nov 2007 update. Exchange rate from the Federal Reserve Statistical Release Jan, 2001 and Nov, 2007. The number of millionaires in the United States is a surprisingly difficult question to answer. CNN Money gives the number as 9.3 million households. Merrill Lynch gives the number at 1.9 million households. That's a huge difference. The number of people in poverty is also an open question. The Census Bureau has their numbers, numbers that others think are drastically undercounted.)

Shaggate - Only Rudy Does Adultry Right

Great job on this by Stranahan:

ROFLMAO

I May Owe President Bush an Apology - The NCAA/BCS Is More Screwed Up Then The Bush Administration

I may owe the Bushies an apology I have repeatedly expressed that their's is the most fouled up organization in the world. However, the NCAA/BCS annual fiasco may just be well beyond the Bushies ineptitude.

Why, oh why, are we even having this conversation.

Only one team lined up every Saturday and beat the team across the field from them, no lame excuse “our QB’s finger was hurt that week”, “it was a quality loss”....that's all bullshit....until there is a playoff and if there is an undefeated Div 1 team they belong in the National Championship game.

Go Warriors!!!

But alas, the ineptitude and greed of the NCAA/BCS just dashes the hopes and dreams of glory for a few college ballplayers and their rabid fans. George’s ineptitude has cost us Billions of dollars and thousand of brave soldiers lives and well being.